Legal Opinion
In re Riddell Concussion Reduction Litigation
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 15, 2015No. Civil Action No. 13-7585 (JBS/JS)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs contend in these consolidated actions1 that Riddell, Inc. and its associated corporate entities (collectively, “Rid-dell” or “Defendants”) marketed a line of football helmets, primarily to youth and high school football players, with the purported ability to reduce concussions based on unique concussion reduction technology, yet Defendants’ helmets are no more capable of reducing concussions than other football helmets.
This matter comes before the Court on a motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Riddell, Inc., Riddell Sports Group,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Argabright v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Mladenov v. Wegmans Food Markets, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Peruto v. Timbertech Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- In re Riddell Concussion Reduction LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.