State ex rel. Willacy v. Smith
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Willacy asserts in his propositions of law that the court of appeals erred in granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment and denying the requested writs of prohibition and mandamus. Before summary judgment may be granted, it must be determined that (1) no genuine issue as to any material fact remains to be litigated, (2) the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and (3) it appears that reasonable minds can come to only one conclusion of the evidence, and viewing the evidence most strongly in favor of the nonmoving party, that conclusion is adverse to the party against…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mootispaw v. EcksteinOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Goldstein v. ChristiansenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Daggett v. GessamanOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- State ex rel. Sellers v. GerkenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Newton v. Court of ClaimsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State ex rel. Mayer v. HensonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Mayer v. HensonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Rootstown Local School District Board of Education v. Portage County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Rogers v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Sartini v. YostOhio Supreme Court · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.