Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Rogers v. Brown

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1997No. 97-547PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

Appellant asserts in his sole proposition of law that a prohibition action is not rendered moot when a trial court exercises its jurisdiction by journalizing its judgment entry before the court of appeals acts on *410the requested writ. The court of appeals held that Judge McGee Brown’s journalization of an entry granting a postdecree motion for interest rendered moot appellant’s complaint for a writ of prohibition because the action sought to be prevented had occurred. We disagree with this determination.

As Judge McGee Brown concedes, the court of appeals erred in so…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fogle v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Litty v. LeskovyanskyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Willacy v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sartini v. YostOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. Stern v. MascioOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Sartini v. YostOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. LoudenOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State ex rel. National Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. Ohio Bureau of Employment ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1998

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API