State ex rel. Rogers v. Brown
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.
Appellant asserts in his sole proposition of law that a prohibition action is not rendered moot when a trial court exercises its jurisdiction by journalizing its judgment entry before the court of appeals acts on *410the requested writ. The court of appeals held that Judge McGee Brown’s journalization of an entry granting a postdecree motion for interest rendered moot appellant’s complaint for a writ of prohibition because the action sought to be prevented had occurred. We disagree with this determination.
As Judge McGee Brown concedes, the court of appeals erred in so…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Fogle v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Litty v. LeskovyanskyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Willacy v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
3Cited by41 opinions
- State ex rel. Sartini v. YostOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Stern v. MascioOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Sartini v. YostOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. LoudenOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. National Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. Ohio Bureau of Employment ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1998
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.