Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Mayer v. Henson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 2002No. 2002-0761PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 97 Ohio St.3d 276.] THE STATE EX REL. MAYER, PROS. ATTY., APPELLANT, v. HENSON, JUDGE, ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Mayer v. Henson,

2002-Ohio-6323.] Mandamus sought to compel common pleas court judge to vacate his nunc pro tunc entry involving relator and reinstate relator’s 1983 sentence— Prohibition—Writ prohibiting common pleas court judge from exercising further jurisdiction to enforce his nunc pro tunc entry or taking other action regarding relator’s sentence—Court of appeals’ dismissal of complaint reversed and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fogle v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Mayer v. HensonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Dannaher v. CrawfordOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Munic. Court v. State, Ex Rel.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  5. State ex rel. Willacy v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. State v. BeasleyOhio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State ex rel. Sapp v. Franklin County Court of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State ex rel. Duran v. KelseyOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State ex rel. DeWine v. BurgeOhio Supreme Court · 2011

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API