Legal Opinion

Small Prop. Owners of S.F. Inst. v. City & Cnty. of S.F.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided April 11, 2018No. A145860PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

*79The City and County of San Francisco adopted an ordinance that allows property owners to make changes to certain types of housing units that previously could not be enlarged, altered or reconstructed. But the ordinance imposes waiting periods of up to 10 years before changes can be made to units where tenants are evicted under "no-fault" provisions, including tenants who are evicted in accordance with the Ellis Act, which allows property owners who seek to exit the rental business to evict residential tenants and prohibits local governments from "compel[ling] the owner of any residential real…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Nash v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Bravo Vending v. City of Rancho MirageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. L.A Lincoln Place Invr's, LTD. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hamilton and High LLC v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  2. Hamilton and High, LLC v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  3. Hollywoodians Encouraging Rental Opportunities v. City of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Hollywoodians Encouraging Rental Opportunities v. City of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. Riddle v. Vallely CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API