Legal Opinion
Hollywoodians Encouraging Rental Opportunities v. City of L. A.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided June 28, 2019No. B285553Published
1Opinion of the CourtEdmon, P. J.
*772Plaintiffs and appellants Hollywoodians Encouraging Rental Opportunities (HERO), Sylvie Shain (Shain), and Max Blonde (Blonde) (sometimes collectively referred to as HERO) appeal a judgment denying their petition for writ of mandate. HERO's petition sought to set aside actions taken by defendants and respondents City of Los Angeles, City Council of the City of Los Angeles (City Council), and Central Los Angeles Area Planning Commission (Commission) (collectively, the City) in approving a proposal by real parties in interest and respondents Millennium Settlement Consulting/1850 North Cherokee,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Communities for a Better Environment v. South Coast Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. San Mateo County Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Lincoln Place Tenants Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.