Driessen v. Moening
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Appeals from orders denying plaintiffs’ separate blended motions for amended findings or new trial bring for review two suits involving identical issues. Consolidated for trial below, they are similarly submitted here.
The relief wanted was a mandatory injunction compelling defendants to remove a dam claimed to have been wrongfully constructed at the outlet of Little Birch Lake in Stearns county, and for damages for flooding their farm lands which abut upon it. The precise question, so plaintiffs say, here to be determined, is whether a release executed by them to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. MannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Hoyt v. Kittson County State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Erickson v. County of StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Klimes v. HanekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hartwig v. Loyal Order of Moose, Brainerd Lodge No. 1246Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Adamson v. DoughertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Philips v. AretzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Julius v. LenzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- State v. ArendsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.