Nash v. Kirschoff
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
This case was brought here before by defendants’ appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial. 157 Minn. 418, 196 N. W. 488, and the order was reversed. A motion for amended findings, coupled with a motion for a new trial, had been made and the appeal was from the orders of the district court denying both motions.
When the case came back to the district court, defendants renewed their motion for amended findings. The motion was granted, judgment on the amended findings was entered, and plaintiff has appealed from the judgment.
At the outset, repeating what has often been…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Desaman v. Butler Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- First National Bank v. TowleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Kurtz v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Breen v. CameronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Hunt v. Meeker County Abstract & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Schulte v. CH PETERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Marty v. NordbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Lee v. ZaskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.