Legal Opinion

Demar v. United States

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 19, 2001No. 00 C 3169PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KEYS, United States Magistrate Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Reimbursement. Plaintiff Arnold Demar seeks reimbursement from Defendant of the monies advanced to David F. Beigler, M.D., one of Plaintiffs treating physicians, and for other deposition related fees. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.

BACKGROUND

While this appears, at first blush, to be a routine motion for reimbursement, it actually concerns matters of first impression for courts in the Seventh Circuit. Dr. Beigler is one of Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baker v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1995
  2. Mangla v. University of RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1996
  3. Hose v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1994
  4. Edin v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1999
  5. Coleman v. DydulaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Baker v. John Morrell & Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
  2. Lamere v. New York State Office for the AgingDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004
  3. Wirtz v. Kansas Farm Bureau Services, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005
  4. Johnson v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. Mock v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API