Legal Opinion
Baker v. John Morrell & Co.
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided May 21, 2003No. C01-4003-MWBPublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR AMENDMENT OF JUDGMENT AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
BENNETT, Chief Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND .1168
II. ANALYSIS.1169
A. Prospective Equitable Relief Available Under Title VII.1169
B. Baker’s Request For Prospective Equitable Relief.1170
1. Reinstatement .1170
2. Front Pay .1175
3. Calculation of the front pay award.1184
C. Plaintiff’s Request for Attorney’s Fees.1187
1. Applicable standards.1188
2. Reasonable hourly rate.1189
3. Hours reasonably expended.1195
4. Partial success.1199
5. Calculation of attorney…
2Cases cited124 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Aery v. Wallace Lincoln-Mercury, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2005
- Dalles Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Armstrong v. AMERICAN PALLET LEASING INC.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2009
- Bunda v. PotterDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2005
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.