Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Dydula
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided December 28, 1999No. 96-CV-244C(H)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
On September 7, 1999, this court issued an order (Item 58) granting defendants’ motion to preclude plaintiffs from introducing the testimony of vocational expert Herbert Weber because plaintiffs failed to comply with this court’s previous decision and order, dated April 26, 1999 (Item 48), granting in part and denying in part defendants’ prior motion to compel full and complete disclosure of expert witness information in accordance with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The court also granted defendants’ request for an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Magee v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Wreath v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- Salas v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1995
- Baker v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1995
- Mangla v. University of RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lamere v. New York State Office for the AgingDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004
- Cabana v. ForcierDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Broushet v. Target Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Demar v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- Wirtz v. Kansas Farm Bureau Services, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.