Legal Opinion

Ninaus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 14, 1998No. 97-0191PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchudson, J.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Associates Health & Welfare Plan (Wal-Mart) appeals from the judgment determining its subrogation rights with respect to medical payments made on behalf of Julie Radish. Wal-Mart argues that the trial court erred in concluding: (1) that it was not entitled to subrogated recovery of its payments for Radish's 1994 medical costs; and (2) that the subrogated amount it was entitled to recover for Radish's 1995 medical costs was subject to. a one-third reduction for part of Radish's attorneys' fees. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

In 1994, Radish, a Wal-Mart employee, and Alma Ninaus…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. M & I First National Bank v. Episcopal Homes Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  3. Tamera Herrmann v. Cencom Cable Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Dugan v. NicklaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  5. Sanders v. ScheidelerDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Palmerton v. Associates' Health & Welfare PlanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  2. Johnson v. ZieglerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API