Legal Opinion

Palmerton v. Associates' Health & Welfare Plan

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 14, 2003No. 02-1741PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, C.J.

¶ 1. Judy and Russell Palmerton appeal a judgment awarding Associates' Health and Welfare Plan $35,683.29 on its subrogation claim for medical expenses paid on Judy's behalf. The Plan is a self-funded benefit plan for Wal-Mart employees under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). The Plan paid Judy's medical expenses arising from an automobile accident. The Palmertons sued the tortfeasor and joined the Plan as a defendant. The Palmertons sought to dismiss the Plan and extinguish its subrogation claim because it failed to answer the complaint. The court granted the Palmertons'…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Rimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated Associates' Health and Welfare Plan and Administrative Committee, Administrator of the Plan v. Denise WellsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Oostburg State Bank v. United Savings & Loan Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Klaus v. Vander HeydenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hadrian v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  2. Hadrian v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  3. Ammerman v. HAUDENCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API