Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Scheideler

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 23, 1993No. 92-C-0477-CPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

CRABB, Chief Judge.

This is a civil action for a declaration of rights to the proceeds of an insurance policy. The parties asserting rights are defendants Joshua, Andrea, Dustin and Daniel Scheide-ler, all minors, and defendant NEPCO EMBA, a self-insured employee benefit plan established under 29 U.S.C. § 1102. The dispute concerns defendant NEPCO EMBA’s entitlement to reimbursement for medical payments made on behalf of the Seheidelers.

Before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment by the Scheideler children and NEPCO EMBA. NEPCO EMBA contends that it is subrogated…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Bank Leumi Le-Israel, B.M., a Foreign Corporation v. Dennis Lee, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. The Sunbeam-Oster Company, Inc. Group Benefits Plan for Salaried and Non-Bargaining Hourly Employees v. Leonard Whitehurst, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Provident Life & Accident Insurance v. WilliamsDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1994
  3. Equity Fire & Casualty Co. v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Murzyn v. Amoco Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995
  5. Springs Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. CarpenterDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API