Sanders v. Scheideler
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
CRABB, Chief Judge.
This is a civil action for a declaration of rights to the proceeds of an insurance policy. The parties asserting rights are defendants Joshua, Andrea, Dustin and Daniel Scheide-ler, all minors, and defendant NEPCO EMBA, a self-insured employee benefit plan established under 29 U.S.C. § 1102. The dispute concerns defendant NEPCO EMBA’s entitlement to reimbursement for medical payments made on behalf of the Seheidelers.
Before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment by the Scheideler children and NEPCO EMBA. NEPCO EMBA contends that it is subrogated…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bank Leumi Le-Israel, B.M., a Foreign Corporation v. Dennis Lee, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- The Sunbeam-Oster Company, Inc. Group Benefits Plan for Salaried and Non-Bargaining Hourly Employees v. Leonard Whitehurst, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance v. WilliamsDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1994
- Equity Fire & Casualty Co. v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Murzyn v. Amoco Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995
- Springs Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. CarpenterDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.