Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1977No. C 75-10-3328 Cr., CA 5782, SC 24801PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Defendant was convicted of criminal activities in drugs. His conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals, 26 Or App 565, 553 P2d 1078 (1976). This court granted review.

Defendant took the stand in his defense. On direct examination he was asked to recite his prior criminal convictions. He listed convictions for (1) larceny, (2) writing insufficient fund checks, and (3) criminal activity in drugs. Thereafter, on cross-examination by the district attorney, the following transpired:

"BY MS. STAHANCYK [Prosecutor]:
"Q Mr. Johnson, are you a drug dealer?
"MR. TORAN [Defense Counsel]: Objection.
"THE…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ManriqueOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. RolloOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Mannix v. Portland TelegramOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. State v. GilbertOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Smith v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. GibsonOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. GiddensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Givens v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API