Legal Opinion

State v. Manrique

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1975PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

Defendant was convicted of criminal activity in drugs for the sale of heroin to an undercover police officer in Portland, in violation of ORS 167.207. He appealed on the ground that the trial court erred in permitting the state to introduce evidence of prior sales of heroin.

The state offered the testimony of an undercover police officer that on May 13, 1973, he came in contact with defendant and inquired whether defendant knew where he could get some “stuff”; that defendant said that he did and asked for $12, which was paid to him; that defendant left for about five minutes and then returned,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. LittleArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. McLeanOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State v. KristichOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. State v. O'DonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  5. State v. ZimmerleeOregon Supreme Court · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. HockingsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Byers v. Santiam Ford, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API