Legal Opinion

State v. Giddens

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 10, 1994No. 148, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

This case involves Maryland Rule 1-502, which governs the admissibility of prior convictions for impeachment purposes. It provides in pertinent part:

“For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, evidence that the witness has been convicted of a crime shall be admitted if elicited from the witness or established by public record during cross-examination, but only if [ (1) ] the crime was an infamous crime or other crime relevant to the witness’s credibility and [ (2) ] the court determines that the probative value of admitting this evidence outweighs the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. Mohammad Reza MehrmaneshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. State v. LagaresSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  3. United States v. Jesus OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. State v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  5. State v. GeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. State v. WestpointCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. Cure v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API