Mannix v. Portland Telegram
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
The complaint was amended before the trial so as to conform to the decision of this court on the former appeal, by alleging-plaintiff’s good standing as a lawyer. Upon the trial, the defendant contended that it published the story as a news item and without malice. As held upon the former appeal, the publication set forth is libelous per se.
Soon after this action was commenced, on October 19, 1928, the deposition of Harry McDonald was taken before Judge Kanzler in his court room in Multnomah county. The deposition was not used upon the trial of the cause. On October 19 the defendant published…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Upton v. HumeOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Sweet v. Post Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Hayes v. Press Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Leonard v. PopeMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Long v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. James A. LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- In Re SEALED MOTIONCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- In Re MinkoffDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1972
- Bowerman v. Detroit Free PressMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.