Legal Opinion

Mannix v. Portland Telegram

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1933PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

The complaint was amended before the trial so as to conform to the decision of this court on the former appeal, by alleging-plaintiff’s good standing as a lawyer. Upon the trial, the defendant contended that it published the story as a news item and without malice. As held upon the former appeal, the publication set forth is libelous per se.

Soon after this action was commenced, on October 19, 1928, the deposition of Harry McDonald was taken before Judge Kanzler in his court room in Multnomah county. The deposition was not used upon the trial of the cause. On October 19 the defendant published…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Upton v. HumeOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Sweet v. Post Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Hayes v. Press Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  4. Leonard v. PopeMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Long v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. James A. LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. In Re SEALED MOTIONCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  3. In Re MinkoffDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1972
  4. Bowerman v. Detroit Free PressMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API