Bagby v. Walker
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeals from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The cases are stated in the opinion of the Court. Exception. — At the trial Walker and Myers offered five prayers, the first and fifth of which the Court (Ritchie, J.,) rejected, and they are omitted. The second, third and fourth prayers, which are sufficiently set out in the opinion of this Court, were granted. Bagby and Rivers offered five prayers. Their insertion is deemed unnecessary.
Read the full summary
Appeals from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The cases are stated in the opinion of the Court. Exception. — At the trial Walker and Myers offered five prayers, the first and fifth of which the Court (Ritchie, J.,) rejected, and they are omitted. The second, third and fourth prayers, which are sufficiently set out in the opinion of this Court, were granted. Bagby and Rivers offered five prayers. Their insertion is deemed unnecessary. The first and fourth prayers were rejected, and the second, third and fifth prayers were granted. Bagby and Rivers excepted to the rejection of their first…
1Opinion of the CourtMcShbrry, J.
The only questions involved in the two cases now before us arise on the single exception reserved to the rulings of the Superior Court of Baltimore on several prayers for instructions to the jury. There were two actions between the same parties tried at the same time in the Court below. In one, Walker and Myers, the appellees here, were plaintiffs, and the appellants were defendants; in the other Bagby and Rivers, the appellants here, were plaintiffs, and the appellees were defendants. In the first, Walker and Myers sued to recover the balance due upon the contract price of certain lumber…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stange v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Central Trust Co. v. Arctic Ice Machine Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
- Pinney v. First Division of the St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Pinckney v. Dambmann Bros., & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
- Eichelberger v. M'CauleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1821
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Colt v. . KimballSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Robberson Steel Co. v. HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- Shooters Island Shipyard Co. v. Standard Shipbuilding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
- Austin v. WelchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Novelty Advertising Co. v. Farmers Mutual Tobacco Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.