Novelty Advertising Co. v. Farmers Mutual Tobacco Warehouse Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, J.,
after stating the case: The decisions in this jurisdiction are to the effect that when an executory contract for the sale of goods, not presently in existence and ready for delivery, but to be thereafter manufactured, is rescinded before the. work is completed, the vendor will not be allowed to increase his damages by continuing to manufacture the goods after notice of rescission, but his damages in such cases are to be measured as of the time of the breach of the contract by the vendee. Clothing Co. v. Stadiem, 149 N. C., 6; Heiser v. Mears, 120 N. C., 443. The theory upon which…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Goddard v. BinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- W. R. Danforth & Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
- Moline Scale Co. v. BeedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Collins v. DelaporteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Flynn v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Perfecting Service Co. v. Product Development & Sales Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Monger v. . LutterlohSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Tower Contracting Company v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- First National Pictures Distributing Corp. v. SeawellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Rockingham County v. Luten Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.