Legal Opinion

Central Trust Co. v. Arctic Ice Machine Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 15, 1893PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeals from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The Court below (Wick.es, J.) decreed that the Central Trust Company of New York was not entitled to a lien upon the machines and appurtenances erected upon the premises by the Arctic Ice Machine Manufacturing Company, and that as against the said Central Trust Company of New York, the Ice Machine Manufacturing Company was entitled to immediate possession of said machines and appurtenances, but that as against the Maryland…

Read the full summary

Appeals from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The Court below (Wick.es, J.) decreed that the Central Trust Company of New York was not entitled to a lien upon the machines and appurtenances erected upon the premises by the Arctic Ice Machine Manufacturing Company, and that as against the said Central Trust Company of New York, the Ice Machine Manufacturing Company was entitled to immediate possession of said machines and appurtenances, but that as against the Maryland Ice Company, the Arctic Ice Machine Manufacturing Company was not entitled to the said machines and appurtenances until…

1Opinion of the CourtMcSiieury, J.

On the third day of April, 1890, the Maryland Ice Company, a body corporate, executed and acknowledged, and on the fifth of the same month placed upon record in Baltimore City, a mortgage to the Central Trust Company of New York, bearing date March the first, 1890, and conveying certain property, fully described, and also all property thereafter acquired, for the purpose of securing the payment of two hundred and fifty bonds, each for the sum of one thousand dollars, together with the coupons attached for the amount of the semi-annual interest; and at the same time it executed and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Galveston Railroad v. CowdreySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Gurney v. Atlantic & Great Western Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Abbott v. GatchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
  4. Day v. . PoolNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Toledo, Delphos & Burlington Railroad v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Evergreen Amusement Corp. v. MilsteadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. M & R Contractors & Builders, Inc. v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  3. Maryland Trust Co. v. National Mechanics BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  4. C. W. Hunt Co. v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  5. Machine Co. v. . Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API