Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Holland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 2005No. 2004-1812PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Darrell Wendell Holland Jr., of Canton, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0022551, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1982. On October 6, 2003, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, charged respondent with having violated the Code of Professional Responsibility. A panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline heard the cause, including comprehensive stipulations and other evidence, and made findings of misconduct and a recommendation, which the board adopted.

Misconduct

{¶ 2} Relator’s complaint alleged that respondent had seriously overcharged for his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MarkijohnOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. GerrenOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. BattOhio Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. AgopianOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. FumichOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. StaffordOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Toledo Bar Assn. v. StahlbushOhio Supreme Court · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API