Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Agopian

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 2006No. 2006-0779PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 1} In this case, we are called upon to determine the appropriate sanction for an attorney who submitted inaccurate fee bills to the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas for legal services rendered as court-appointed counsel to indigent criminal defendants.

{¶ 2} The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline adopted the panel’s sanction and recommended that the Supreme Court impose a one-year stayed suspension of Richard V. Agopian’s license to practice law for allegedly improperly billing the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas for court-appointed legal services. After a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re PennicaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  3. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. HollandOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. CarrollOhio Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. BrickerOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. FumichOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. SabroffOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Akron Bar Ass'n v. CatanzariteOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. HoppelOhio Supreme Court · 2011

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API