Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Markijohn

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 2003No. 2003-0724PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Darrell N. Markijohn of Canton, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0030554, was admitted to the Ohio bar in 1985. On October 7, 2002, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, charged respondent with having violated DR 1-102(A)(4) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation). A panel appointed by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline heard the cause and, based on stipulations and other evidence, made findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a recommendation.

{¶ 2} Respondent initiated the investigation that led to this complaint by advising relator…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. MillonigOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. StatzerOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. FumichOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. HollandOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. KriegerOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. StubbsOhio Supreme Court · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API