Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Fumich

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 2007No. 2007-0733PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, William Mark Fumich Jr. of Westlake, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0022600, was admitted to the Ohio bar in 1976. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we impose a 12-month stayed suspension of respondent’s license to practice law based on findings that he committed several disciplinary violations. On review, we adopt the board’s findings of misconduct and recommended sanction.

{¶ 2} On June 15, 2006, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a two-count amended complaint charging respondent with several violations of the Code of Professional…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. AgopianOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MarkijohnOhio Supreme Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. LawsonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. PfundsteinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. StaffordOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Mariotti (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. DockryOhio Supreme Court · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API