Prince v. Saginaw Logging Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.
The plaintiff, a woodsman employed by the Saginaw Logging Company, brought this action against his employer to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by reason of its negligence.
The defendant owned and maintained, for the convenience of its employees, a group of bunkhouses, consisting of ordinary box cars fitted with double bunks. The box cars were placed endwise in three parallel rows, extending east and west, with two walkways, on a level with the car floors between the rows, for the passage of employees to and from their sleeping quarters. By this arrangement, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Abraham v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Hama Hama Logging Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Seattle Can Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Ek v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Mud Bay Logging Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Bordeaux v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- Kingery v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Kingery v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Henderson v. Bardahl International Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- Griffith v. Raven Red Ash Coal Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1942
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.