Legal Opinion

Ek v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1935No. 25455. Department OnePublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court sustaining the rejection by the department of a claim for a widow’s pension under the industrial insurance act.

The facts found and the conclusions drawn by the trial court are sufficiently shown by the following excerpts from the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law:

‘ ‘ That on the 22nd day of May, 1931, the said Charles Ek, was employed by Tom Drylie at a daily wage to dig a cess-pool and connect a sewer drain from an old cess-pool to the new one; that the said Tom Drylie was the sole owner of the property on which the work…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beels v. Department of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Laramie Poudre Irrigation Co. v. Redfeather Lakes Resort, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1934

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Prince v. Saginaw Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Magma Copper Co. v. NaglichArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Laird v. State of Vermont Highway Dept.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  4. LeBire v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Mud Bay Logging Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API