Ek v. Department of Labor & Industries
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court sustaining the rejection by the department of a claim for a widow’s pension under the industrial insurance act.
The facts found and the conclusions drawn by the trial court are sufficiently shown by the following excerpts from the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law:
‘ ‘ That on the 22nd day of May, 1931, the said Charles Ek, was employed by Tom Drylie at a daily wage to dig a cess-pool and connect a sewer drain from an old cess-pool to the new one; that the said Tom Drylie was the sole owner of the property on which the work…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Beels v. Department of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Laramie Poudre Irrigation Co. v. Redfeather Lakes Resort, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1934
3Cited by19 opinions
- Prince v. Saginaw Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
- Magma Copper Co. v. NaglichArizona Supreme Court · 1942
- Laird v. State of Vermont Highway Dept.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- LeBire v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Mud Bay Logging Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1938
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.