Legal Opinion

Mud Bay Logging Co. v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1938No. 26416. En BancPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Rehearing.

Simpson, J.

The Departmental opinion in this case appears in 189 Wash. 285, 64 P. (2d) 1054. A rehearing was granted and arguments thereon presented to the court sitting En Banc on two subsequent occasions. After a full consideration, a majority of the court adhere to the views expressed in the original opinion.

At the last hearing, there was presented, for the first time, the question of the employer’s right to appeal to the courts from the decision of the appellant’s joint board. We feel it desirable to state definitely our position on that question.

The legislature of 1911 passed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hama Hama Logging Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Seattle Can Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Nafus v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Ek v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Albrecht v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Olympia Brewing Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Prince v. Saginaw Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Striebeck v. Employment Security AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  4. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. State Ex Rel. Crabb v. OlingerWashington Supreme Court · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API