Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Bardahl International Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1967No. 38795PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This is an action to recover commissions alleged to be owing to the plaintiff, J. A. Henderson, by the defendant, Bardahl International Corporation.

The plaintiff was originally a distributor of Bardahl products in eastern Canada and, subsequently, in specifically designated countries throughout the world. He appointed Giorgio Geddes as a subdistributor for Italy. Later, the defendant made Geddes its exclusive distributor in certain areas which had originally been the plaintiff’s territory. (We shall throughout this opinion refer to the plaintiff as Henderson, the defendant as Bardahl, and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. The Evergreens v. NunanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. Mall Tool Co. v. Far West Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Bordeaux v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Beverly Beach Properties v. NelsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Nielson v. Spanaway General Medical ClinicWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of SantoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  4. Reninger v. State Dept. of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Reninger v. Department of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court · 1998

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API