Bordeaux v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.
Where the Supervisor of Industrial Insurance, on a finding that claimant’s condition was not the result of the injury alleged, rejects a claim for compensation and medical aid based on a severe and protracted nosebleed occurring during employment, is such rejection res judicata of a subsequent action brought by the claimant against a third party for the same injury arising out of the same occurrence?
John J. Bordeaux worked for the Port of Seattle with the railroad track and maintenance crew. While tamping rock around railroad ties with a power-driven pneumatic tamping machine, January 19,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Greene v. RothschildWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Owens v. KuroWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Rufener v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Abraham v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- United States v. Itt Rayonier, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Northwest Independent Forest Manufacturers v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Martin v. RingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Loveridge v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.