Legal Opinion
Lindsay v. Pierre
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 9, 2005No. AC 25835PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The plaintiff, Heather Lindsay, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, Richarde Pierre. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that the two year statute of limitations in General Statutes § 52-584 barred her negligence action. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following undisputed facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of this appeal. On May 5,2001, the plaintiff was involved in a motor vehicle accident with the defendant. At the scene of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burns v. Hartford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Rosato v. MascardoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Lagassey v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Mountaindale Condominium Ass'n v. ZapponeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Tarnowsky v. SocciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rockwell v. QuintnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. CharlesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Rickel v. KomaromiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Sakon v. MANAGERConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Kissel v. Center for Women's Health, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.