Legal Opinion
Rockwell v. Quintner
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 27, 2006No. AC 26799PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROGERS, J.
The plaintiff in this dental malpractice action, Veronica Rockwell, appeals following the trial court’s rendering of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Mitchell L. Quintner, on the ground that the action was time barred. She claims on appeal that the court (1) improperly rendered summary judgment because the complaint and the defendant’s affidavit raised an issue of material fact in regard to whether secondary treatment performed by the defendant caused some of the injuries alleged, which would make the action timely, (2) abused its discretion in denying her…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Fogarty v. RashawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Plouffe v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- New Milford Savings Bank v. RoinaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Lagassey v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Grasso v. Connecticut Hospice, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Himmelstein v. Town of WindsorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Gianetti v. Health Net of Connecticut, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Mott v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Martinez v. Southington Metal Fabricating Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.