Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Watts

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1991PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

This declaratory judgment litigation was filed by Allstate Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellee, to determine whether liability under a homeowner’s policy issued to Dewey and Louise Crafton was negated by an exclusion for injuries arising out of the maintenance of a motor vehicle. The trial court, using the concurrent cause doctrine, held that Allstate was obligated to provide coverage to the policyholders. The Court of Appeals, using the chain of events doctrine, reversed. For the reasons set forth below, we find that the exclusion does not apply and, accordingly,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Garvey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  3. LeJeune v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  4. Lawver v. BolingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. NoskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. McConnell v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re the Adoption of E.N.R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Tata v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  4. American Justice Insurance Reciprocal v. HutchisonTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Leonard Gamble v. Sputniks, LLCTennessee Supreme Court · 2012

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API