State v. Minh Hoang
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.
Relying on State v. Ladson, 138 Wn.2d 343, 979 P.2d 833 (1999), and State v. DeSantiago, 97 Wn. App. 446, 983 P.2d 1173 (1999), Minh Hoang contends that his possession of cocaine conviction must be reversed because the cocaine was discovered as the result of a pretextual traffic stop in violation of article I, section 7 of the Washington Constitution. But the trial court’s unchallenged findings of fact fully support its conclusion that this traffic stop was not unconstitutionally pretextual, and it is clear from the record that the trial court considered the totality of the circumstances in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. ArmentaWashington Supreme Court · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. ArreolaWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.