State v. Arreola
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
González, J.
¶1 The issue in this case is whether a traffic stop motivated primarily by an uncorroborated tip, but also independently motivated by a reasonable articulable suspicion of a traffic infraction, is unconstitutionally pretextual under article I, section 7 of the Washington State Constitution and State v. Ladson, 138 Wn.2d 343, 979 P.2d 833 (1999).
¶2 We hold that a mixed-motive traffic stop is not pretextual so long as the desire to address a suspected traffic infraction (or criminal activity) for which the officer has a reasonable articulable suspicion is an actual, conscious, and…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. StroudWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. MyrickWashington Supreme Court · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- State v. HintonWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. MuhammadWashington Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. ReederCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.