Legal Opinion

State v. Arreola

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2012No. 86610-4PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

González, J.

¶1 The issue in this case is whether a traffic stop motivated primarily by an uncorroborated tip, but also independently motivated by a reasonable articulable suspicion of a traffic infraction, is unconstitutionally pretextual under article I, section 7 of the Washington State Constitution and State v. Ladson, 138 Wn.2d 343, 979 P.2d 833 (1999).

¶2 We hold that a mixed-motive traffic stop is not pretextual so long as the desire to address a suspected traffic infraction (or criminal activity) for which the officer has a reasonable articulable suspicion is an actual, conscious, and…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. StroudWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. MyrickWashington Supreme Court · 1984

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  2. State v. HintonWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. State v. MuhammadWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. ReederCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API