Legal Opinion

State v. Ladson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1999No. 65801-3PublishedCited by 323 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.

— The issue is whether pretextual traffic stops violate article I, section 7, of the Washington Constitution. We find they do and, accordingly, reverse the Court of Appeals and reinstate the trial court’s suppression order.

The facts are basically undisputed. On October 5, 1995 City of Lacey police officer Jim Mack and Thurston County sheriffs detective Cliff Ziesmer were on proactive gang *346patrol. The officers explained they do not make routine traffic stops while on proactive gang patrol although they use traffic infractions as a means to pull over people in order to initiate contact and…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by323 opinions

  1. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. DuncanWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. DuncanWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019

318 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API