State v. Nichols
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Petitioner Caleb George Nichols was convicted of possession of methamphetamine. He maintains that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move to suppress evidence obtained following a stop of the vehicle in which he was a passenger. Nichols argues that the stop was pretextual and thus negates his subsequent consent to the search of his person that resulted in discovery of methamphetamine hidden in his sock. The Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. We affirm the Court of Appeals.
Madsen, J.
FACTS
¶2 The parties stipulated to the facts set out in police reports describing the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- State v. KylloWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. KylloWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. ArreolaWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.