State v. Armenta
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
Petitioners Huberto Armenia and David Cruz obtained review of a decision of the Court of Appeals that reversed the superior court’s dismissal of informations charging each of them with possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. The issues before us are whether, under the facts found by the trial court at a suppression hearing, petitioners were detained in violation of their Fourth Amendment rights and, if so, whether that illegal detention vitiated the consent they gave to search their vehicle. We conclude that because petitioners’ conduct did not present a reasonable and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by220 opinions
- State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. DanielTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. ArmentaWashington Supreme Court · 1997
215 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.