Legal Opinion

Missouri Commission on Human Rights v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 27, 1985No. WD 36363PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

This appeal concerns handicap discrimination in its hiring practices by Southwestern Bell (Bell) as against the claimant Shirley Hodges. See §§ 296.010 — 296.070, RSMo, 1978. As described infra, “handicap,” as applicable here means a physical impairment resulting in a disability unrelated to job duties. In April, 1979, Hodges applied for the position of clerk/typist at Southwestern Bell and received an offer of employment conditioned on her “pre-placement medical evaluation form” being satisfactory. Hodges checked off twelve medical conditions including most recently that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Midstate Oil Co. v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. American National Insurance v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Bey v. BolgerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Commonwealth, Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Kansas City v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cassista v. Community Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Gimello v. Agency Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  3. Wentz v. Industrial AutomationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Laclede Cab Co. v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. City of Clayton v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API