Kansas City v. Missouri Commission on Human Rights
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
MORGAN, Judge.
This contested case comes before the Court upon appeal by appellant (City of Kansas City) seeking review of a final decision of the Missouri Commission on Human Rights (Commission) which found appellant in violation of Chapter 296, RSMo 1978. 1 Specifically, the Commission found appellant to be practicing sex discrimination by paying Marialice Estopare and Mary Bresh-ears, complainant-intervenor-respondents herein, at a rate less than males for jobs “shown to be substantially equal in regard to effort, skill and responsibility under similar working conditions....” 2
Initially, it…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Brookhaven General HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Shultz v. Wheaton Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Corning Glass Works, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- George P. Shultz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. American Can Company — Dixie Products, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Midstate Oil Co. v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Lacey v. State Board of Registration for the Healing ArtsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Missouri Commission on Human Rights v. City of Sikeston/Sikeston Power Plant/Board of Municipal UtilitiesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Community Bancshares, Inc. v. Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
- Laclede Cab Co. v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.