Legal Opinion

Cassista v. Community Foods, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1993No. S028230PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARABIAN, J.

We granted review to consider whether the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA or Act) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.) prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of a person’s weight. We conclude that weight may qualify as a protected “handicap” or “disability” within the meaning of the FEHA if medical evidence demonstrates that it results from a physiological condition affecting one or more of the basic bodily systems and limits a major life activity. Because the plaintiff here adduced no evidence of this kind, we conclude that she failed to establish a prima…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State Personnel Board v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State Division of Human Rights v. Xerox Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Northern California, Inc. v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. American National Insurance v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. MontoyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Jensen v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Prilliman v. United Air Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Colmenares v. Braemar Country Club, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Covenant Care, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API