Legal Opinion
Viktron/Lika v. Labor Commission
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided December 13, 2001No. 20000386-CAPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACKSON, Associate Presiding Judge:
11 Appellant Viktron/Lika Utah (Viktron) appeals the decision of the Appeals Board (Board) of the Utah Labor Commission (Commission), which ruled that "Viktron retaliated against [Joyce R. Wright] in violation of the Utah Antidiscrimination Act," see Utah Code Ann. §§ 34A-5-101 to -107 (Supp.2001) 1 and affirmed the Commission's award of damages to Wright. We affirm in part and remand.
BACKGROUND
12 Wright, an engineer, worked for Vik-tron as a cam operator from March 1995 to October 20, 1995, when she was involuntarily terminated. During the course of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Fayette Long Jeanell Reavis v. Eastfield CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Carol Aman Jeanette Johnson v. Cort Furniture Rental CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Anderson v. Coors Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Higgins v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wolfe v. Becton Dickinson and Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Edward Tuohy v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Carter v. Labor Commission Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
- Darvish v. Labor Commission Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- Hexcel v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.