Legal Opinion
Darvish v. Labor Commission Appeals Board
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided March 8, 2012No. 20100981-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VOROS, Associate Presiding Judge:
{1 Petitioner Soudabeh Darvish petitions for review of a decision of the Utah Labor Commission Appeals Board. The Board ruled that Darvish's claim for retaliation based on national origin was legally unsupportable. We decline to disturb the Board's ruling.
BACKGROUND
T2 The Board adopted the "relevant portions" of the findings of fact entered by the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). The ALJ's findings are not challenged on appeal, and we summarize them here. 1
T3 Darvish is an Iranian-born Persian of the Islamic faith, She holds a master's degree in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kunej v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- Christensen v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
- Pentskiff Interpreting Services v. Department of Health, Division of Medicaid & Health Financing Office of Formal HearingsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- Darvish v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- Zu v. Avalon Health CareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020