Legal Opinion
Hexcel v. Labor Commission
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided April 21, 2022No. 20200514-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
2022 UT App 52
THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS HEXCEL CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. LABOR COMMISSION AND MICHAEL PICKARD, Respondents. Opinion No. 20200514-CA Filed April 21, 2022 Original Proceeding in this Court Matthew M. Durham and Vaughn G. Pedersen, Attorneys for Petitioner David J. Holdsworth, Attorney for Respondent Michael Pickard JUDGE RYAN M. HARRIS authored this Opinion, in which JUDGES MICHELE M. CHRISTIANSEN FORSTER and DAVID N. MORTENSEN concurred. HARRIS, Judge: ¶1 Hexcel Corporation (Hexcel) fired Michael Pickard, ostensibly because Pickard was caught napping during work hours. But…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kendrick v. Penske Transportation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Young v. Dillon Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Manzanares v. ByingtonUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Vaughn v. Epworth VillaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Christensen v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
- State v. DebrokUtah Supreme Court · 2025
- Christensen v. Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2025
- Friends of Great Salt Lake v. UDEQCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023