Legal Opinion

Campbell v. MacHias Savings Bank

District Court, D. Maine

Decided October 7, 1994No. Civ. 93-0282-BPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

BRODY, District Judge.

This dispute arises out of a loan transaction between Plaintiff, Lisa M. Campbell, and Defendant, Machias Savings Bank. Plaintiff asserts that the Bank violated certain provisions of the Real Estate Settlement Practices Act, 12 U.S.C. §§ 2601-17; and both federal and state Truth-in-Lending Acts, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1667e, and 9-A M.R.S.A. §§ 8-101 to 8-404 (Supp.1994). She also raises a number of state common-law claims. The Bank moves for partial summary judgment. 1

The facts, viewed in the light most favorable to Campbell, the non-moving…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Financial General Bankshares, Inc. v. Eugene J. Metzger, Financial General Bankshares, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Eugene J. MetzgerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State of Louisiana v. Litton Mortgage CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. Lake v. First Nationwide BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Barbosa v. Target Mortgage Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1997
  4. Sturm v. Peoples Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  5. Brophy v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API