Legal Opinion

Hennis Freight Lines, Inc. v. Burlington Mills Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1957No. 386PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The appeal rests on Exception No. 8, which is: “The plaintiffs except to the charge because the Court failed to declare and explain the law arising on the evidence given in the case in that the Court failed to declare and failed to explain the principles of last clear chance or discovered peril as such principles related to the first issue.”

The exception is without merit. The doctrine of last clear chance was not germane to the first issue.

The doctrine of last clear chance presupposes negligence on the part of the injured person, and has no application on his behalf unless he is chargeable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Waddell v. CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Suits v. Old Equity Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Mount Olive Mfg. Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Chestnut v. . SuttonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Clay v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Bumgarner Ex Rel. Bumgarner v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Dodd v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. MullenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API