Legal Opinion

State v. Mullen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 15, 1990No. 891SC603PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendant first assigns as error the admission of testimony by Agent Felton concerning defendant’s statements to him describing how drugs could be hidden to prevent detection by law enforcement officers. Defendant argues that this testimony was “unfairly prejudicial and irrelevant in that it implied to the jury that the defendant was a person of bad character because of his extensive criminal knowledge in how to allude (sic) apprehension or arrest in dealing in or handling drugs.” Defendant contends that evidence offered in the proffered testimony constituted other wrongs or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. ConnleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Ingle v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Hennis Freight Lines, Inc. v. Burlington Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilson ex rel. Wilson v. BellamyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  2. WILSON BY WILSON v. BellamyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API