Chestnut v. . Sutton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOR, J.
The facts alleged in the complaint are sufficient to constitute two causes of action, on either of which the plaintiff is entitled to recover of the defendant damages, both actual and punitive. Cottle v. Johnson, 179 N. C., 426, 102 S. E., 769. In that case it is said that the gravamen of the cause of action for the alienation of the affections of plaintiff’s wife is the deprivation of the plaintiff of his conjugal rights to the society, affection and assistance of his wife, and that the gravamen of the cause of action for criminal conversation is the defilement of plaintiff’s wife by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Powell v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Cottle v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Powell v. . StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
3Cited by10 opinions
- Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Sebastian v. KluttzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Bryant v. . CarrierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Scott v. KikerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Barker v. DowdySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.