National Abortion Federation v. Center for Medical Progress
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF DISTRICT JUDGE UNDER 28 U.S.C. §§ 144 AND 455
Re: Dkt. No. 428
JAMES DONATO, United States District Judge
Defendants David Daleiden and The Center for Medical Progress seek to disqualify United States District Judge William H. Orrick, III from continuing to preside over this case. The motion is denied.
*1087BACKGROUND
This case began on July SI, 2015, when plaintiff National Abortion Federation (“NAF”) sued The Center for Medical Progress (“CMP”), BioMax Procurement Services, LLC, David Daleiden and Troy Newman. Dkt. No. 1. Judge Orrick was randomly assigned to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Richard R. SiblaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Stephen Yagman v. Republic Insurance Cna Insurance Valley Forge InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Jeffrey L. Clemens v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, United States of America, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Greenspan v. QaziDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Hayes v. State of OregonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
- Johnson v. BarrDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- MAJORITY FORWARD v. BEN HILL COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONSDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2020
- United States v. HuttDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.