Greenspan v. Qazi
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AARON JACOB GREENSPAN, Case No. 20-cv-03426-JD 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE RULE 60(B) MOTION v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 178 10 OMAR QAZI, et al., Defendants. 11 12 13 Pro se plaintiff Aaron Greenspan asks for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil 14 Procedure 60(b). Dkt. No. 178; see also Dkt. No. 172 (judgment). The parties’ familiarity with 15 the record, including the Court’s several orders, is assumed. Relief from judgment is denied. 16 As the Supreme Court recently stated: 17 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Kemp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- National Abortion Federation v. Center for Medical ProgressDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017